HPV testing in the screening and follow-up of patients with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | HPV testing in the screening and follow-up of patients with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2019 |
Auteurs | Gonthier C., Desportes C., Pretet J.-L, Azais H., Uzan C., Mergui J-L., Canlorbe G. |
Journal | GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE |
Volume | 47 |
Pagination | 747-752 |
Date Published | OCT |
Type of Article | Review |
ISSN | 2468-7197 |
Mots-clés | Cervical cancer, Cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion, HPV testing, Human papilloma virus |
Résumé | Objectives. - To evaluate the value of high-risk HPV (HR HPV) testing in screening and post-treatment follow-up of high-grade squamous intraepithelial cervical lesions (HSIL). Methods. - A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2019 was conducted including the following keywords: ``human papilloma virus'', ``HPV testing'', ``cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion'', ``cervical cancer''. Result. - Numerous recent randomized studies and meta-analyzes have concordant results in favor of HR HPV superiority over cervical smear in the screening and post-treatment monitoring of HSIL. In screening, the sensitivity of the HR HPV tests is 63% to 98% whereas that of the cervical smear is only 38% to 65% for the detection of HSIL+ (HSIL and invasive cancers). A negative HR HPV test is associated with less than 5% risk of LIEHG + at 6 years. In addition, after removal of a LIEHG, HR HPV tests have a sensitivity > 90% and specificity > 80% to predict treatment failure. After surgicale exision, a negative HR HPV test is associated with a risk of failure < 2% (negative predictive value of 98%), and 12-25% if it is positive. Conclusions. - HR HPV tests are effective, allowing early detection of LIEHG+ identification of low-risk women in case of negative test, and a prediction of the risk of failure after treatment. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.gofs.2019.09.004 |