Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer: Post hoc Analysis of the MOSAIC and PETACC-8 Trials
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer: Post hoc Analysis of the MOSAIC and PETACC-8 Trials |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2019 |
Auteurs | Auclin E, Taieb J, Lepage C, Aparicio T, Faroux R, Mini E, Folprecht G, Salazar R, Benetkiewicz M, Banzi M, Louvet C, Van Laethem J-L, Tabernero J, Hickish T, de Gramont A, Andre T, Vernerey D |
Journal | CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION |
Volume | 28 |
Pagination | 1153-1161 |
Date Published | JUL |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 1055-9965 |
Résumé | Background: We explored and validated the association of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in stage III colon cancer. Methods: Patients with stage III colon cancer from the MOSAIC and PETACC-8 trials were enrolled. The relation between CEA and outcomes was continuously modeled with the restricted cubic splines (RCS) method. Association of CEA with outcomes was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, with two risk groups among patients with a CEA level >5 ng/mL. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were constructed. Results: The CEA level was available in 1,292 (96%) and 2,477 (97%) patients in the discovery and validation cohorts. The RCS analysis confirmed that patients with a CEA level >5 ng/mL were at highest risk of recurrence or death and those with a CEA level >5 ng/mL presented a heterogeneous risk population. In the discovery cohort, the 3-year DFS rate was 75%, 65%, and 45% in a group of patients with CEA level of 0-1.30 ng/mL (n = 630), 1.30-5 ng/mL (n = 613), and >5 ng/mL (n = 49), respectively (P < 0.001). CEA was independently associated with end-points. All findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: Postoperative CEA level was highly and independently associated with DFS and OS, especially in patients with a CEA level of >5 ng/mL, suggesting that this cutoff is not optimal. Impact: CEA levels should be applied more accurately in future trials and clinical practice. |
DOI | 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0867 |