Use of coupler for venous anastomoses in cervico-facial reconstruction. Retrospective study on 51 free flaps

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreUse of coupler for venous anastomoses in cervico-facial reconstruction. Retrospective study on 51 free flaps
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursVernier-Mosca M., Feuvrier D., Obert L., Mauvais O., Loisel F., Pluvy I
JournalANNALES DE CHIRURGIE PLASTIQUE ESTHETIQUE
Volume65
Pagination236-243
Date PublishedJUN
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0294-1260
Mots-clésCervico-facial reconstruction, Coupler, Free flap, Microsurgery, Venous anastomoses
Résumé

Objective. - The aim of our study was to evaluate the interest of the mechanical anastomosic coupling device for venous anastomoses in a series of cervico-facial reconstructions after carcinologic excision. Patients and methods. - Between January 2010 and December 2017, 46 patients underwent free flap cervico-facial reconstruction. We performed 54 venous anastomoses for 51 free flaps. Mechanical venous anastomoses were performed with a coupler (Coupler (R)). Thrombotic complications and choice of recipient vessels were assessed for the entire series. Results. - Venous anastomoses were performed using a coupler in 33.3% of the flaps (n = 18). Mean operative time was lower for reconstructions with mechanical coupler anastomoses, and significantly for fibula flaps. Of eight thromboses, six were venous, two of which after the coupler anastomosis. The thrombosed veins were the branches of the internal jugular vein and the anterior jugular veins. The diameter of the couplers used was respectively 2.5 mm and 2 mm. Conclusion. - The use of the microvascular coupling system for venous anastomoeis would help reduce the occurrence of venous thrombosis, but larger and prospective studies should be conducted. This coupling system, relatively easy to use, would overcome the lack of congruence of anastomosing veins and reduce the risk of intimal injury. Regarding the recipient vessels, the anterior jugular vein should not be used as first line because the risk of vascular complications seems more important. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.anplas.2019.06.011