Targeted and immune therapies among patients with metastatic renal carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis: A systemic review

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreTargeted and immune therapies among patients with metastatic renal carcinoma undergoing hemodialysis: A systemic review
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursKlajer E, Garnier L, Goujon M, Schlurmann-Constans F, Mery B, Hon TNguyen Tan, Mouillet G, Calcagno F, Thiery-Vuillemin A
JournalSEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume47
Pagination103-116
Date PublishedAPR-JUN
Type of ArticleReview
ISSN0093-7754
Mots-clésDialysis, Immunotherapy, Pharmacokinetic, Systemic therapies
Résumé

Background: Patients with severe renal impairment or undergoing hemodialysis are usually excluded from clinical trials. Available data regarding safety and activity of systemic therapies (ST) in hemodialyzed patients are scarce. Methods: Clinical data were searched through PubMed database until April 2020 according to PRISMA criteria. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment of ST were reported. Results: Among 270 references, 56 reports were evaluated in full text: 41 were included for efficacy and 42 for safety analysis (sunitinib n= 68, bevacizumab n = 6, everolimus n = 28, temsirolimus n=17, sorafenib n = 55, axitinib n= 13, pazopanib n =13, nivolumab n =18, cabozantinib n = 0, lenvatinib n= 0, and ipilimumab n= 0). Twelve of the reports included PK assessment among dialyzed patients. Hemodialysis did not seem to modify the expected efficacy and safety of each compound among patients undergoing hemodialysis. PK assessments were not modified in comparison with a population not undergoing dialysis. Conclusion: Targeted and Immune therapies seem to be effective and can be used among patients undergoing hemodialysis. Due to frailty and comorbidities associated to chronic hemodialysis enhanced vigilance for these therapies within this specific population is recommended. Dedicated prospective clinical trials would definitely help to obtain data with a higher level of evidence. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.05.001