Peer-Reviewed Literature on Grain Legume Species in the WoS (1980-2018): A Comparative Analysis of Soybean and Pulses
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Peer-Reviewed Literature on Grain Legume Species in the WoS (1980-2018): A Comparative Analysis of Soybean and Pulses |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2019 |
Auteurs | Magrini M-B, Cabanac G, Lascialfari M, Plumecocq G, Amiot M-J, Anton M, Arvisenet G, Baranger A, Bedoussac L, Chardigny J-M, Duc G, Jeuffroy M-H, Journet E-P, Juin H, Larre C, Leiser H, Micard V, Millot D, Pilet-Nayel M-L, Nguyen-The C, Salord T, Voisin A-S, Walrand S, Wery J |
Journal | SUSTAINABILITY |
Volume | 11 |
Pagination | 6833 |
Date Published | DEC |
Type of Article | Article |
Mots-clés | agricultural sciences, bibliometric data, food sciences, knowledge dynamics, research trajectories, science and technology studies (STS), scientometrics, sustainability |
Résumé | Grain-legume crops are important for ensuring the sustainability of agrofood systems. Among them, pulse production is subject to strong lock-in compared to soya, the leading worldwide crop. To unlock the situation and foster more grain-legume crop diversity, scientific research is essential for providing new knowledge that may lead to new development. Our study aimed to evaluate whether research activity on grain-legumes is also locked in favor of soya. Considering more than 80 names grouped into 19 main grain-legume species, we built a dataset of 107,823 scholarly publications (articles, book, and book chapters) between 1980 and 2018 retrieved from the Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) reflecting the research activity on grain-legumes. We delineated 10 scientific themes of interest running the gamut of agrofood research (e.g., genetics, agronomy, and nutrition). We indexed grain-legume species, calculated the percentage of records for each one, and conducted several analyses longitudinally and by country. Globally, we found an unbalanced research output: soya remains the main crop studied, even in the promising field of food sciences advanced by FAO as the ``future of pulses''. Our results raise questions about how to align research priorities with societal demand for more crop diversity. |
DOI | 10.3390/su11236833 |