A clinical scoring system for congenital contractural arachnodactyly

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreA clinical scoring system for congenital contractural arachnodactyly
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursMeerschaut I, De Coninck S, Steyaert W, Barnicoat A, Bayat A, Benedicenti F, Berland S, Blair EM, Breckpot J, De Burca A, Destree A, Garcia-Minaur S, Green AJ, Hanna BC, Keymolen K, Koopmans M, Lederer D, Lees M, Longman C, Lynch SAnn, Male AM, McKenzie F, Migeotte I, Mihci E, Nur B, Petit F, Piard J, Plasschaert FS, Rauch A, Ribai P, Pacheco ISalcedo, Stanzial F, Stolte-Dijkstra I, Valenzuela I, Varghese V, Vasudevan PC, Wakeling E, Wallgren-Pettersson C, Coucke P, De Paepe A, De Wolf D, Symoens S, Callewaert B
JournalGENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume22
Pagination124-131
Date PublishedJAN
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1098-3600
Mots-clésBeals syndrome, clinical score, congenital contractural arachnodactyly, diagnostic criteria, fibrillin-2
Résumé

Purpose Congenital contractural arachnodactyly (CCA) is an autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder manifesting joint contractures, arachnodactyly, crumpled ears, and kyphoscoliosis as main features. Due to its rarity, rather aspecific clinical presentation, and overlap with other conditions including Marfan syndrome, the diagnosis is challenging, but important for prognosis and clinical management. CCA is caused by pathogenic variants in FBN2, encoding fibrillin-2, but locus heterogeneity has been suggested. We designed a clinical scoring system and diagnostic criteria to support the diagnostic process and guide molecular genetic testing. Methods In this retrospective study, we assessed 167 probands referred for FBN2 analysis and classified them into a FBN2-positive (n = 44) and FBN2-negative group (n = 123) following molecular analysis. We developed a 20-point weighted clinical scoring system based on the prevalence of ten main clinical characteristics of CCA in both groups. Results The total score was significantly different between the groups (P < 0.001) and was indicative for classifying patients into unlikely CCA (total score <7) and likely CCA (total score >= 7) groups. Conclusions Our clinical score is helpful for clinical guidance for patients suspected to have CCA, and provides a quantitative tool for phenotyping in research settings.

DOI10.1038/s41436-019-0609-8