Enriching standards-based digital thread by fusing as-designed and as-inspected data using knowledge graphs

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreEnriching standards-based digital thread by fusing as-designed and as-inspected data using knowledge graphs
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursKwon S, Monnier LV, Barbau R, Bernstein WZ
JournalADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS
Volume46
Pagination101102
Date PublishedOCT
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1474-0346
Mots-clésData fusion, Digital thread, Industrial data standard, Knowledge graph, ontology, Product lifecycle
Résumé

Realizing the digital thread is essential for linking and orchestrating data across the product lifecycle in smart manufacturing. Linking heterogeneous lifecycle data is critical to maintain associativity and traceability in a digital thread. Recently, researchers have successfully leveraged ontology models with knowledge graphs in engineering domains for threading different lifecycle data. One of the most successful of such efforts is OntoSTEP which enables the formal capture of information embedded in the STandard for Exchange of Product model data (STEP) data representation, or ISO 10303. Meanwhile, an emerging inspection standard, called the Quality Information Framework (QIF), has garnered significant attention as it can bring quality information into the digital thread. Implementing more automated methods for product quality assurance is challenging due to the lack of unified information models from design to inspection. To this end, we propose an approach to fuse as designed data represented in STEP and as-inspected data represented in QIF in a standards-based digital thread based on ontology with knowledge graphs. Specifically, we present an automated pipeline for generating knowledge graphs representing STEP and QIF data, a mapping implementation to integrate STEP and QIF knowledge graphs, and rules and queries to demonstrate the integration's potential for better decision making with respect to product quality assurance.

DOI10.1016/j.aei.2020.101102