Determinants of high-grade anal intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive MSM

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreDeterminants of high-grade anal intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive MSM
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuteursClifford GM, Siproudhis L, Piroth L, Poizot-Martin I, Radenne S, Reynes J, Lesage A, Heard I, Henno S, Flejou J-F, Marchand L, Combes J-D, Etienney I, Grp ANRSEP57 APACH
JournalAIDS
Volume32
Pagination2363-2371
Date PublishedOCT 23
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0269-9370
Mots-cléshigh-grade anal intraepithelial lesions, high-resolution anoscopy, HIV, Human papillomavirus, MSM
Résumé

Objective: To assess determinants for histologically proven high-grade anal intraepithelial lesions (hHSIL) in HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM), a population at high-risk of HPV-related anal cancer. Design: APACHES is a prospective study of anal HPV and related-lesions in 513 HIV positive MSM aged at least 35 years in six centres across France. Methods: At baseline, participants underwent high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) with biopsy of suspicious lesions, preceded by anal swabs for liquid-based cytology, p16/Ki67 immunostaining, and HPV DNA. hHSIL diagnosis was established by histopathological review panel consensus, and determinants assessed by logistic regression. Results: Baseline hI ISIL prevalence was 10.4% and did not differ significantly by age, sexual behaviour or HIV/immunodeficiency markers. hHSIL prevalence was significantly elevated in participants who smoked (ORadj = 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.5) or who, in concurrent anal swabs, had ASCUS/LSIL (3.6, 95% CI 1.4-9.3) or ASC-H/HSIL (22.2, 95% CI 6.8-72.6) cytologic abnormalities, p16/Ki67 dual positivity (3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.5), or non-HPV16 HR (13.0, 95% CI 1.7-102), but most notably, HPV16 (46.3, 95% CI 6.1-355) infection. Previous diagnosis of low-grade (2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.4) or high-grade (3.8, 95% CI 1.5-9.9) anal lesion also conveyed higher hHSIL risk. After controlling for patient-specific determinants, there remained significant centre-specific effects, most clearly in higher risk groups (HPV16-positive participants: 31.3% hHSIL in centres A-D versus 5.1% in centres E and F, P < 0.01). Conclusion: Anal cytology and HPV16 infection are potentially useful determinants of hHSIL risk in HIV-positive MSM, but HIV/immunodeficiency-related variables appear not to be. Controlling for patient-specific hHSIL determinants highlights variability in HRA practice across diverse clinical settings and the need for better standardization of this difficult procedure. Copyright (C) 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1097/QAD.0000000000001947