Dosing issues with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Why we should not underdose our patients
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Dosing issues with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation: Why we should not underdose our patients |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Auteurs | Dillinger J-G, Aleil B, Cheggour S, Benhamou Y, Bejot Y, Marechaux S, Delluc A, Bertoletti L, Lellouche N |
Journal | ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES |
Volume | 111 |
Pagination | 85-94 |
Date Published | FEB |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 1875-2136 |
Mots-clés | Apixaban, Atrial fibrillation, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, Rivaroxaban |
Résumé | Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) - dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban - are well established in terms of preventing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and high thromboembolism risk. When prescribed incorrectly, NOACs are associated with an increased risk of ischaemic events and bleeding. Current NOAC labels explicitly address dose adjustments according to age, body weight, renal function and concomitant treatment with P-glycoprotein inhibitors. The required dose adjustments vary significantly from molecule to molecule, thereby creating a complex dose adjustment environment. Furthermore, recommendations support assessment of individual risk using thromboembolic and bleeding risk scores. Evidence-based medicine also provides data about specific patient profiles. In particular, some patients who are at higher risk of bleeding, such as patients on polymedication, are often at higher risk of stroke. More and more patients are being treated with NOACs. The question of appropriate dosing has become important, as studies are starting to show that reduced doses are being prescribed at very high rates. Although these data have not been evaluated in light of individual risk assessments, in everyday practice, physicians are often more concerned about drug-related bleeding than about the spontaneous evolution of the disease (stroke/systemic embolism), leading to high rates of prescription of inadequately low doses. Recent results have shown that only certain risk criteria justify dose reduction. Thus, the right dose needs to be prescribed for the right patient in order to obtain, in real-life practice, the benefits of NOACs that have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.04.008 |