Impact of nutrition route on microaspiration in critically ill patients with shock: a planned ancillary study of the NUTRIREA-2 trial

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreImpact of nutrition route on microaspiration in critically ill patients with shock: a planned ancillary study of the NUTRIREA-2 trial
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursNseir S, Le Gouge A, Lascarrou J-B, Lacherade J-C, Jaillette E, Mira J-P, Mercier E, Declercq P-L, Sirodot M, Piton G, Tinturier F, Coupez E, Gaudry S, Djibre M, Thevenin D, Pasco J, Balduyck M, Zerimech F, Reignier J
JournalCRITICAL CARE
Volume23
Pagination111
Date PublishedAPR 5
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1466-609X
Mots-clésCritical care, Gastric contents, Microaspiration, Oropharyngeal secretions, Pathophysiology, Pneumonia
Résumé

{BackgroundMicroaspiration of gastric and oropharyngeal secretions is the main mechanism of entry of bacteria into the lower respiratory tract in intubated critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of enteral nutrition, as compared with parenteral nutrition, on abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions.MethodsPlanned ancillary study of the randomized controlled multicenter NUTRIREA2 trial. Patients with shock receiving invasive mechanical ventilation were randomized to receive early enteral or parenteral nutrition. All tracheal aspirates were collected during the 48h following randomization. Abundant microaspiration of gastric contents and oropharyngeal secretions was defined as the presence of significant levels of pepsin (>200ng/ml) and salivary amylase (>1685UI/ml) in >30% of tracheal aspirates.ResultsA total of 151 patients were included (78 and 73 patients in enteral and parenteral nutrition groups, respectively), and 1074 tracheal aspirates were quantitatively analyzed for pepsin and amylase. Although vomiting rate was significantly higher (31% vs 15%

DOI10.1186/s13054-019-2403-z