Second-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Second-line therapy in elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2014 |
Auteurs | Quoix E, Westeel V, Moreau L, Pichon E, Lavole A, Dauba J, Debieuvre D, Souquet PJean, Bigay-Game L, Dansin E, Poudenx M, Molinier O, Vaylet F, Moro-Sibilot D, Herman D, Sennelart H, Tredaniel J, Mennecier B, Morin F, Baudrin L, Milleron B, Zalcman G, Cancerologie IFrancophon |
Journal | EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL |
Volume | 43 |
Pagination | 240-249 |
Date Published | JAN |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0903-1936 |
Résumé | There is no dedicated study on second-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report the results on second-line erlotinib therapy from our previously published phase III study comparing single-agent therapy with platinum-based doublet (carboplatin plus paclitaxel) therapy in 451 elderly patients. Erlotinib was given to patients exhibiting disease progression or experiencing excessive toxicity during first-line therapy, until further progression or unacceptable toxicity. In total, 292 (64.7%) patients received erlotinib as second-line therapy. Initial performance status 0-1, stage IV NSCLC and an Activities of Daily Living score of 6 were independent factors for receiving erlotinib. Median (95% CI) overall survival was 4 (3.2-6.7) versus 6.8 (5.0-8.3) months in the single-agent and doublet arms, respectively (p=0.089). Performance status 0-1, never having smoked, adenocarcinoma and weight loss <= 5% were favourable independent prognostic factors of survival, whereas the randomisation arm had no significant impact. Among the 292 patients who received erlotinib, 60 (20.5%) experienced grade 3-4 toxic effects, the most frequent being rash. Erlotinib as second-line therapy is feasible, leading to efficacy results similar to those obtained in a previous randomised study that was not dedicated to elderly patients, with acceptable toxicity. |
DOI | 10.1183/09031936.00048213 |