Organizing medical oncology care at a regional level and its subsequent impact on the quality of early breast cancer management: a before-after study
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Organizing medical oncology care at a regional level and its subsequent impact on the quality of early breast cancer management: a before-after study |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2014 |
Auteurs | Voidey A, Pivot X, Woronoff A-S, Nallet G, Cals L, Schwetterle F, Limat S |
Journal | BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH |
Volume | 14 |
Pagination | 326 |
Date Published | JUL 28 |
Type of Article | Article |
Mots-clés | Breast cancer, Economic evaluation, Medical management, Quality measurement, Regional organization |
Résumé | {Background: One of the main measures of the French national cancer plan is to encourage physicians to work collectively, and to minimize territorial inequities in access to care by rethinking the geographical distribution of oncologists. For this reason, cancer care services are currently being reorganized at national level. A new infrastructure for multidisciplinary cancer care delivery has been put in place in our region. Patients can receive multidisciplinary health care services nearer their homes, thanks to a mobile team of oncologists. The objective of our study was to assess, using a quality approach, the impact on medical management and on the costs of treating early breast cancer, of the new regional structure for cancer care delivery. Methods: Before-and-after study performed from 2007 to 2010, including patients treated for early breast cancer in three hospitals in the region of Franche-Comte in Eastern France. The main outcome measures were quality criteria, namely delayed treatment (>12 weeks), dose-intensity and assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy. Other outcomes were 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and economic evaluation. Results: This study included 667 patients. The rate of chemotherapy tended to decrease, but not significantly (49.3% before versus 42.2% after |
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-326 |