Comparison of the serological tests ICT and ELISA for the diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis in France

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreComparison of the serological tests ICT and ELISA for the diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis in France
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuteursKnapp J, Sako Y, Grenouillet F, Bresson-Hadni S, Richou C, Gbaguidi-Haore H, Ito A, Millon L
JournalPARASITE
Volume21
Pagination34
Date PublishedJUL 25
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1252-607X
Mots-clésAlveolar echinococcosis, Diagnosis, immunochromatography, rapid test, rEm18, rEm18-ELISA and Em2-Em18-ELISA tests
Résumé

Serological diagnosis of alveolar echinococcosis (AE) is a key element for efficient patient treatment management. A rapid immunochromatography test kit (ICT) using the recombinant Em18 antigen (rEm18) was recently developed. The aim of our study was to assess this test on a panel of sera from French patients with alveolar echinococcosis and control patients. In a blind test, a total of 112 serum samples were tested including samples of AE (n = 30), cystic echinococcosis [CE] (n = 15), and polycystic echinococcosis [PE] (n = 1). For the comparison, 66 sera from patients with hepatocarcinoma, fascioliasis, toxocariasis, Caroli's disease, or autoimmune chronic active hepatitis were used. The diagnostic test sets we used were the rEm18-ICT and two validated ELISAs with rEm18 and Em2-Em18 antigens, respectively. For the ICT, 27/30 sera from AE patients, 4/15 sera from CE patients and the PE patient serum were positive. One serum from the control panel (toxocariasis) was positive for the ICT. The rEm18-ICT sensitivity (90.0%) and specificity (92.7%) for detection of Em18-specific antibodies confirmed it as a relevant tool for AE diagnosis. The rEm18-ELISA had a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 91.5%, and the Em2-Em18-ELISA had a sensitivity of 96.7% and specificity of 87.8%. However, when AE patient sera are recorded as weak in intensity with the ICT, we recommend a double reading and use of a reference sample if the ICT is used for patient follow-up.

DOI10.1051/parasite/2014037