Selection of appropriate end-points (pCR vs 2yDFS) for tailoring treatments with prediction models in locally advanced rectal cancer

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreSelection of appropriate end-points (pCR vs 2yDFS) for tailoring treatments with prediction models in locally advanced rectal cancer
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuteursValentini V, van Stiphout RGPM, Lammering G, Gambacorta MA, Barba MC, Bebenek M, Bonnetain F, Bosset JF, Bujko K, Cionini L, Gerard JP, Roedel C, Sainato A, Sauer R, Minsky BD, Collette L, Lambin P
JournalRADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume114
Pagination302-309
Date PublishedMAR
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0167-8140
Mots-clésdisease-free survival, pathological complete response, Personalized treatment, Prediction models, Rectal cancer, Risk ratio
Résumé

Purpose: Personalized treatments based on predictions for patient outcome require early characterization of a rectal cancer patient's sensitivity to treatment. This study has two aims: (1) identify the main patterns of recurrence and response to the treatments (2) evaluate pathologic complete response (pCR) and two-year disease-free survival (2yDFS) for overall survival. (OS) and their potential to be relevant intermediate endpoints to predict. Methods: Pooled and treatment subgroup analyses were performed on five large European rectal cancer trials (2795 patients), who all received long-course radiotherapy with or without concomitant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy. The ratio of distant metastasis (DM) and local recurrence (LR) rates was used to identify patient characteristics that increase the risk of recurrences. Findings: The DM/LR ratio decreased to a plateau in the first 2 years, revealing it to be a critical follow-up period. According to the patterns of recurrences, three patient groups were identified: 5-15% had pCR and were disease free after 2 years (excellent prognosis), 65-75% had no. pCR but were disease free (good prognosis) and 15-30% had neither pCR nor 2yDFS (poor prognosis). Interpretation: Compared with pCR, 2yDFS is a stronger predictor of OS. To adapt treatment most efficiently, accurate prediction models should be developed for pCR to select patients for organ preservation and for 2yDFS to select patients for more intensified treatment strategies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.001