Active management of the second twin for vaginal delivery: Ruptured versus intact membranes. Apropos a series of 182 patients
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Active management of the second twin for vaginal delivery: Ruptured versus intact membranes. Apropos a series of 182 patients |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2015 |
Auteurs | Roesch M., Mangin M., Bourtembourg A., Desmaret M., Maillet R., Ramanah R., Riethmuller D. |
Journal | JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION |
Volume | 44 |
Pagination | 246-251 |
Date Published | MAR |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0368-2315 |
Mots-clés | Intact membrane, Ruptured membrane, Second twin, Total breech extraction |
Résumé | Aim. -The vaginal management of the second twin (T2) differs throughout our country. In 2009, the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians released practice guidelines, with low-level evidence, encouraging active management of the second twin, using maneuvers with intact membrane. Patients and methods. -In our level III labour ward, these maneuvers are systematically performed when the second twin is in a breech or transverse presentation and after ruptured membranes in most cases. We studied 182 twin pregnancies with active management of the T2 at more than 28 weeks of gestation, from 1st January 1996 to 31st December 2010, by comparing the membrane status during delivery of T2. Results. -The results did not show any significant differences between the two groups of patients concerning the neonatal or maternal results. The technique is feasible, even by residents. Our results show that total breech extraction of the second twin with ruptured membranes is feasible, which allows for reappraisal of the national recommendations. Conclusion. -In our practice, it is possible to actively deliver the T2 with ruptured membranes without altering maternal and fetal prognosis and thus simplifying learning for young doctors. (C) 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jgyn.2014.06.006 |