A phase IIb multicentre study comparing the efficacy of trabectedin to doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic untreated soft tissue sarcoma: The TRUSTS trial

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreA phase IIb multicentre study comparing the efficacy of trabectedin to doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic untreated soft tissue sarcoma: The TRUSTS trial
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuteursBui-Nguyen B., Butrynski J.E, Penel N., Blay J.Y, Isambert N., Milhem M., Kerst J.M, Reyners A.KL, Litiere S., Marreaud S., Collin F., van der Graaf W.TA, STBSG EORTC, SARC
JournalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume51
Pagination1312-1320
Date PublishedJUL
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0959-8049
Mots-clésClinical trial, Doxorubicin, First line chemotherapy, metastatic, Soft-tissue sarcoma, trabectedin
Résumé

{Purpose: To evaluate whether trabectedin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma prolongs progression-free survival (PFS), compared to doxorubicin and, in the phase IIb part here, to select the most appropriate trabectedin treatment schedule (3-hour or 24-hour infusion) in terms of safety, convenience and efficacy. Patients and methods: In this randomised multicentre prospective dose-selection phase IIb superiority trial, 133 patients were randomised between doxorubicin (n = 43), trabectedin (3-hour infusion, T3h) (n = 47) and trabectedin (24-hour infusion, T24h) (n = 43). PFS was defined as time from random assignment until objective progression by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST 1.1), a global deterioration of the health status requiring discontinuation of the treatment, or death from any cause. Results: The study was terminated due to lack of superiority in both trabectedin treatment arms as compared to the doxorubicin control arm. Median PFS was 2.8 months in the T3h arm, 3.1 months in the T24h arm and 5.5 months in the doxorubicin arm. No significant improvements in PFS were observed in the trabectedin arms as compared to the doxorubicin arm (T24h versus doxorubicin: hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.90

DOI10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.023