Three fluoropyrimidine-based regimens in routine clinical practice after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: An AGEO multicenter study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreThree fluoropyrimidine-based regimens in routine clinical practice after nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: An AGEO multicenter study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursPointet A-L, Tougeron D, Pernot S, Pozet A, Bechade D, Trouilloud I, Lourenco N, Hautefeuille V, Locher C, Williet N, Desrame J, Artru P, Soularue E, Le Roy B, Taieb J
JournalCLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume44
Pagination295-301
Date PublishedJUN
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN2210-7401
Mots-clésFOLFIRI, FOLFIRINOX, FOLFOX, metastatic pancreatic cancer, Nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, Second-line chemotherapy
Résumé

Background: A combination of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (N + G) has recently become a standard first-line treatment in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA), but there are currently no published data concerning second-line treatment after N + G. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival outcomes and tolerability of three usual fluoropyrimidine-based regimens FOLFOX, FOLFIRI and FOLFIRINOX after N + G failure in MPA patients. Methods: Patients receiving N + G as first-line regimen were prospectively identified in 11 French centers between January 2014 and January 2017. After disease progression or unac-ceptable toxicity, patients eligible for second-line therapy were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was overall survival following the second-line regimen. Secondary endpoints were objective response, progression-free survival and safety. Results: Out of 137 patients treated with N + G as first-line regimen, 61 (44.5%) received second-line chemotherapy, including FOLFOX (39.4%), FOLFIRI (34.4%) or FOLFIRINOX (26.2%). Baseline characteristics were not different between the 3 groups. In particular, median age was 71.7 years, sex ratio was 1/1, and performance status (PS) was 0 in 11.5% of case. Main grade 3 toxici-ties were neutropenia (4.9%) and nausea (3.3%), without major differences between the groups. No toxic death was observed. Median second-line progression-free survival (PFS) and overall sur-vival (OS) were 2.95 (95% CI: 2.3-5.4) and 5.97 months (95% CI: 4.0-8.0), respectively, with no difference between the 3 groups. Median OS from the start of first-line chemotherapy was 12.7 months (10.4-15.1) and was significantly better in patients receiving FOLFIRI after N + G failure, 18.4 months (95% CI: 11.7-24.1, P < 0.05), as compared with FOLFOX or FOLFIRINOX (10.4 and 12.3 months, respectively). Conclusion: This study suggests that second-line fluoropyrimidine-based regimens after N + G failure are feasible, have a manageable toxicity profile in selected patients with MPA, and are associated with promising clinical outcomes, in particular when combined with irinotecan. Randomized phase 3 trials are needed to confirm this trend. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

DOI10.1016/j.clinre.2019.08.009