Comparative review of imipenem/cilastatin versus meropenem

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreComparative review of imipenem/cilastatin versus meropenem
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursSalmon-Rousseau A., Martins C., Blot M., Buisson M., Mahy S., Chavanet P., Piroth L.
JournalMEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES
Volume50
Pagination316-322
Date PublishedJUN
Type of ArticleReview
ISSN0399-077X
Mots-clésAntibiotic stewardship, Carbapenem, Imipenem/cilastatin, Meropenem
Résumé

Introduction. - Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibacterial molecules. Imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are the two main molecules used in French healthcare services. Objective. - We aimed to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two molecules by considering their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, microbiological, and clinical properties. We demonstrated that imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are not alike. Method. - Review of the literature by querying the MEDLINE network. Results. - Imipenem-cilastatin is the first marketed molecule of the carbapenem class. It is more effective against Gram-positive cocci. Its stability does not allow for long infusions and its main adverse effect on the central nervous system limits its use. Meropenem is more effective against Gram-negative bacilli. Its stability and its milder adverse effects distinguish it from imipenem-cilastatin. Conclusion. - Meropenem is preferred for daily use in healthcare services when carbapenems are to be used. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.medmal.2020.01.001