Comparative review of imipenem/cilastatin versus meropenem
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Comparative review of imipenem/cilastatin versus meropenem |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2020 |
Auteurs | Salmon-Rousseau A., Martins C., Blot M., Buisson M., Mahy S., Chavanet P., Piroth L. |
Journal | MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES |
Volume | 50 |
Pagination | 316-322 |
Date Published | JUN |
Type of Article | Review |
ISSN | 0399-077X |
Mots-clés | Antibiotic stewardship, Carbapenem, Imipenem/cilastatin, Meropenem |
Résumé | Introduction. - Carbapenems are broad-spectrum antibacterial molecules. Imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are the two main molecules used in French healthcare services. Objective. - We aimed to evaluate the relative strengths and weaknesses of these two molecules by considering their pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, microbiological, and clinical properties. We demonstrated that imipenem-cilastatin and meropenem are not alike. Method. - Review of the literature by querying the MEDLINE network. Results. - Imipenem-cilastatin is the first marketed molecule of the carbapenem class. It is more effective against Gram-positive cocci. Its stability does not allow for long infusions and its main adverse effect on the central nervous system limits its use. Meropenem is more effective against Gram-negative bacilli. Its stability and its milder adverse effects distinguish it from imipenem-cilastatin. Conclusion. - Meropenem is preferred for daily use in healthcare services when carbapenems are to be used. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.medmal.2020.01.001 |