Pazopanib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours resistant to imatinib and sunitinib (PAZOGIST): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitrePazopanib plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours resistant to imatinib and sunitinib (PAZOGIST): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 2 trial
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuteursMir O, Cropet C, Toulmonde M, Le Cesne A, Molimard M, Bompas E, Cassier P, Ray-Coquard I, Rios M, Adenis A, Italiano A, Bouche O, Chauzit E, Duffaud F, Bertucci F, Isambert N, Gautier J, Blay J-Y, Perol D, -GETO GSF
JournalLANCET ONCOLOGY
Volume17
Pagination632-641
Date PublishedMAY
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1470-2045
Résumé

{Background Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract. Imatinib followed by sunitinib and regorafenib is the standard sequence of treatment for advanced disease. Pazopanib is effective in soft tissue sarcomas but has never been assessed in advanced GIST in a randomised trial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pazopanib in patients with previously treated advanced GIST. Methods In this randomised, open-label phase 2 study, we enrolled adults (aged =18 years) with advanced GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib from 12 comprehensive cancer centres or university hospitals in France and randomly assigned them 1: 1 using an interactive web-based centralised platform to 800 mg oral pazopanib once daily in 4-week cycles plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. Randomisation was stratified by the number of previous treatment regimens (2 vs =3); no-one was masked to treatment group allocation. Upon disease progression, patients in the best supportive care group were allowed to switch to pazopanib as compassionate treatment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. All randomised participants who received at least one dose of pazopanib were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01323400. Findings Between April 12, 2011, and Dec 9, 2013, 81 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to pazopanib plus best supportive care (n=40) or best supportive care alone (n=41). The median follow-up was 26.4 months (IQR 22.0-37.8) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group and 28.9 months (22.0-35.2) in the best supportive care group. 4-month investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 45.2% (95% CI 29.1-60.0) in the pazopanib plus best supportive care group versus 17.6% (7.8-30.8) in the best supportive care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.96; p=0.029). Median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI 2.4-5.6) with pazopanib plus best supportive care and 2.3 months (2.1-3.3) with best supportive care alone (HR 0.59 [0.37-0.96]

DOI10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00075-9