Switching between thienopyridines in patients with acute myocardial infarction and quality of care
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Switching between thienopyridines in patients with acute myocardial infarction and quality of care |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2016 |
Auteurs | Schiele F, Puymirat E, Bonello L, Meneveau N, Collet J-P, Motreff P, Ravan R, Leclercq F, Ennezat P-V, Ferrieres J, Simon T, Danchin N |
Journal | OPEN HEART |
Volume | 3 |
Pagination | UNSP e000384 |
Date Published | MAY |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 2053-3624 |
Résumé | Objective: In acute coronary syndromes, switching between thienopyridines is frequent. The aims of the study were to assess the association between switching practices and quality of care. Methods: Registry study performed in 213 French public university, public non-academic and private hospitals. All consecutive patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction (MI; <48 hours) between 1/10/2010 and 30/11/2010 were eligible. Clinical and biological data were recorded up to 12 months follow-up. Results: Among 4101 patients receiving thienopyridines, a switch was performed in 868 (21.2%): 678 (16.5%) from clopidogrel to prasugrel and 190 (4.6%) from prasugrel to clopidogrel. Predictors of switch were ST segment elevation MI presentation, admission to a cardiology unit, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, younger age, body weight >60 kg, no history of stroke, cardiac arrest, anaemia or renal dysfunction. In patients with a switch, eligibility for prasugrel was >82% and appropriate use of a switch was 86% from clopidogrel to prasugrel and 20% from prasugrel to clopidogrel. Quality indicators scored higher in the group with a switch and also in centres where the switch rate was higher. Conclusions: As applied in the French Registry on Acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (FAST-MI) registry, switching from one P2Y12 inhibitor to another led to a more appropriate prescription and was associated with higher scores on indicators of quality of care. |
DOI | 10.1136/openhrt-2015-000384 |