Determinants of interest in extended-released buprenorphine: A survey among 366 French patients treated with buprenorphine or methadone

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreDeterminants of interest in extended-released buprenorphine: A survey among 366 French patients treated with buprenorphine or methadone
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2021
AuteursRolland B, Trojak B, Nourredine M, Bachellier J, Chappuy M, Bendimerad P, Kosim M, Hjelmstrom P, Meroueh F, Nubukpo P, Brousse G
JournalDRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE
Volume220
Pagination108492
Date PublishedMAR 1
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0376-8716
Mots-clésBuprenorphine, Extended-release, France, Patients' preference, Survey
Résumé

Aim: To explore the factors determining the interest in extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) injections among patients receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) in France. Methods: 366 patients receiving OAT for opioid use disorder, recruited in 66 French centers, were interviewed from 12/2018 to 05/2019. A structured questionnaire assessed their interest in XR-BUP using a [1-10] Likert scale. `More' vs. `less' interested groups were defined using the median score of interest, and their characteristics were explored using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI). Independent variables were as follows: sociodemographic characteristics, OAT-related features (e.g., type of OAT and prescriber, dosing, or duration of treatment), OAT representations, and personal objectives of treatment. Results: The median interest in XR-BUP was 7 (interquartile range: 3-9) out of 10. The participants who were `more interested' (i.e. those scoring >= 7) showed no substantial difference in sociodemographic characteristics, relative to the `less interested' participants. However, they more frequently reported forgetting to take their OAT (OR = 1.81; CI95 % = 1.06-3.10) or reported experiencing situations where taking their OAT was impractical (aOR = 1.69; CI95 % = 1.05-2.73). Their treatment objective was more focused on stopping illicit drugs (aOR = 1.67; 95 %CI = 1.02-2.70), reducing health risks (aOR = 3.57; 95 %CI = 1.67-7.69) and craving (aOR = 2.38; 95 %CI = 1.39-4.02) or improving family (aOR = 1.81; 95 %CI = 1.03-3.13) or professional (aOR = 2.22; 95 %CI = 1.43-3.85) recovery. Conclusions: In France, where the access to OAT is relatively unrestricted, the majority of participants were interested in XR-BUP formulations. Being interested was associated with treatment objectives focused on abstinence and recovery, and with experiencing constraints in taking a daily oral OAT.

DOI10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108492