Comparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreComparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuteursBen Abdennebi A., Aubry S., Ounalli L., Fayache M.S, Delabrousse E., Petegnief Y.
JournalPHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume33
Pagination77-86
Date PublishedJAN
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1120-1797
Mots-clésCT-scanner, EOS imaging system, Monte Carlo, OSLD NanoDot
Résumé

Purpose: To estimate fetal absorbed doses for pregnant women pelvimetry, a comparative study between EOS imaging system and low-dose spiral CT-scanner was carried out. For this purpose three different studies were investigated: in vivo, in vitro and Monte Carlo calculations. Methods: In vivo dosimetry was performed, using OSL NanoDot dosimeters, to determine the dose to the skin of twenty pregnant women. In vitro studies were established by using a cubic phantom of water, in order to estimate the out of field doses. In the latter study, OSLDs were placed at depths corresponding to the lowest, average and highest position of the uterus. Monte Carlo calculations of effective doses to high radio-sensitive organs were established, using PCXMC and CTExpo software suites for EOS imaging system and CT-scanner, respectively. Results: The EOS imaging system reduces radiation exposure 4 to 8 times compared to the CT-scanner. The entrance skin doses were 74% (p-values < 0.01) higher with the CT-scanner than with the EOS system. In the out of field region, the measured doses of the EOS system were reduced by 80% (p-values < 0.02). Results: Monte Carlo calculations confirmed that effective doses to organs are less accentuated for EOS than for CT pelvimetry. Conclusions: The EOS system is less irradiating than the CT exam. The out-of-field dose which is significant, is lower in the EOS than in the CT-scanner and could be reduced even further by optimizing the time used for image acquisition. (C) 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.008