Exclusive Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts for Myocardial Revascularization Requiring Four Anastomoses or More: Outcomes from a Single Center Experience
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Exclusive Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts for Myocardial Revascularization Requiring Four Anastomoses or More: Outcomes from a Single Center Experience |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Auteurs | Perrotti A, Spina A, Dorigo E, Durst C, Kaili D, Chocron S |
Journal | THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON |
Volume | 65 |
Pagination | 265-271 |
Date Published | JUN |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0171-6425 |
Mots-clés | angina, CABG, coronary artery bypass grafts surgery, ischemic heart disease, off-pump surgery |
Résumé | {Introduction Multivessel coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) has only been uncommon and technically demanding. We describe our experience with BITA only CABGs requiring >= 4 anastomoses. Material and Methods The department's database was queried for patients undergoing isolated CABG with >= 4 anastomoses. The surgical technique included systematically a right internal thoracic artery (ITA) of left ITA Y graft. The multivariate model included variables with a p < 0.3 at univariate analysis. Results Between January 2006 and December 2009, 251 consecutive patients (71 +/- 10 years) (on-pump: 130, off-pump: 121) had CABG with >= 4 anastomoses, representing 21% of total isolated CABGs for the same period; all patients received a totally arterial BITA only revascularization. Follow-up was 4.9 +/- 1.6 years. Overall and cardiac cumulative survivals were 78 and 92%, respectively, at 5 years. The occurrence of anymajor postoperative complication was associated with overall and cardiac mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-9.9 and OR: 5.4, 95% CI: 1.3-21.9, respectively). Major sternal wound complication requiring surgical revision was not associated with impaired glucose control (n = 9; diabetics: 6/82, 7.3%; nondiabetics: 3/169, 1.8% |
DOI | 10.1055/s-0036-1584688 |