Case-Finding for Persistent Airway Obstruction in Farmers: A Questionnaire With Optimal Diagnosis Criteria
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Case-Finding for Persistent Airway Obstruction in Farmers: A Questionnaire With Optimal Diagnosis Criteria |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Auteurs | Guillien A, Soumagne TE, Puyraveau M, Berger P, Guillot SL, Rannou F, Jouneau S, Mauny FJ, Laplante J-J, Dalphin J-C, Degano B |
Journal | AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE |
Volume | 53 |
Pagination | 837-844 |
Date Published | DEC |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0749-3797 |
Résumé | Introduction: Appropriate identification of subjects who are candidates for spirometry through case-finding questionnaires may help solve the problem of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease misdiagnosis. The performance of case-finding questionnaires depends at least partially on the characteristics of the population used for their development. The use of an accurate threshold for the forced expiratory volume in 1 second / forced vital capacity ratio to define persistent airway obstruction is also vital in ascertaining chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: Using a population examined between October 2012 and May 2013 that included a large subset of agricultural workers both exposed and unexposed to tobacco smoking, the authors aimed to select a combination of items that would identify persons most likely to have persistent airway obstruction defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 second / forced vital capacity less than the lower limit of normal according to the Global Lung Initiative-2012 equations. Two thirds of the population (n = 3,397) were randomly selected to develop a questionnaire, and one third (n = 1,698) was reserved for questionnaire validation. Statistical analysis was performed in 2016. Results: The selected items were sex, dyspnea, BMI, tobacco smoking habits, age, history of respiratory diseases, and history of occupation at risk. The C-index of the model was 0.84 (95% CI = 0.80, 0.88) for the development population and 0.76 (95% CI = 0.66, 0.86) for the validation population. Using the selected items in combination, the sensitivity and specificity in identifying persistent airway obstruction were 76% and 77%, respectively, in the development population (and 68% and 73%, respectively, in the validation population) for a threshold value of 2.50%. Conclusions: This seven-item questionnaire is the first developed from a population comprising a large subset of agricultural workers and using the Global Lung Initiative-2012 equations. (C) 2017 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.031 |