How to identify patients at risk of abdominal compartment syndrome after surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the operating room: A pilot study
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | How to identify patients at risk of abdominal compartment syndrome after surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the operating room: A pilot study |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Auteurs | Leclerc B, Mont LSalomon Du, Besch G, Rinckenbach S |
Journal | VASCULAR |
Volume | 25 |
Pagination | 472-478 |
Date Published | OCT |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 1708-5381 |
Mots-clés | aortic aneurysm, Aortic rupture, compartment syndrome, Intra-abdominal hypertension |
Résumé | Objectives: Abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) is poorly identified in surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm and an early management is crucial. The aim of this study was to validate how many risk factors were needed to predict ACS. Secondary objectives were to assess its prevalence and the 30-day mortality. Methods: All patients operated for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm during 5 years were included. An independent committee performed a retrospective diagnosis of ACS. Eight criteria were selected from the literature, and corresponded to pre- and intraoperative period: anemia (hemoglobin lower than 10 g/dL), prolonged shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg more than 18 min), preoperative cardiac arrest, obesity (body mass index> 30), massive fluid resuscitation (>= 3500 mL per hour for at least 1 h) and transfusions (> 10 units packed blood red cell since the beginning of the treatment), severe hypothermia (<= 33 degrees C), acidosis (pH < 7.2). Sensitivity and specificity were assessed for each number of criteria. Results: Eight patients were ACS+ and 28 ACS-, with three criteria for ACS+ and 1.5 for ACS- (p = 0.002). Three criteria among the eight selected criteria have the best cutoff for sensitivity and specificity (75% and 82%) with a positive predictive value of 54% and a negative predictive value of 92%. The prevalence of ACS was 17%. The 30-day mortality in ACS+ tended to be higher than in ACS- (p = 0.108). Conclusion: The present results suggest that patients with an ACS seemed to have higher mortality and the threshold of three factors among eight specific factors is enough to predict this. |
DOI | 10.1177/1708538116689005 |