Concurrent cisplatin and dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC): GORTEC 2004-01 randomized phase III trial
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Concurrent cisplatin and dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus conventional radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC): GORTEC 2004-01 randomized phase III trial |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2020 |
Auteurs | Tao Y, Auperin A, Blanchard P, Alfonsi M, Sun X-S, Rives M, Pointreau Y, Castelli J, Graff P, Kam SWong Hee, Thariat J, Veresezan O, Heymann S, Renard-Oldrini S, Lafond C, Cornely A, Casiraghi O, Boisselier P, Lapeyre M, Biau J, Bourhis J |
Journal | RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY |
Volume | 150 |
Pagination | 18-25 |
Date Published | SEP |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0167-8140 |
Mots-clés | cisplatin, Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, Dose escalation, Head and Neck cancer, IMRT, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy |
Résumé | {Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care (SoC) in locally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). This trial was designed to test whether dose-escalated IMRT and cisplatin could improve locoregional control without increasing complications over 3D-radiotherapy. Methods: Patients were randomized between 70 Gy/35F in 7 weeks with 3D-RT (Arm A) versus 75 Gy/35F with IMRT (Arm B). Both arms received 50 Gy in 25 fractions followed by a sequential boost of 20 Gy/10F in Arm A and 25 Gy/10F to gross tumor volume in Arm B, as well as 3 cycles of cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 during RT. The primary endpoint was locoregional progression (LRP). Results: 188 patients were randomized: 85% oropharynx and 73% stage IVa. P16 status was documented for 137 oropharyngeal tumors with P16+ in 53 (39%) patients; and 90% were smokers. Median follow-up was 60.5 months. Xerostomia was markedly decreased in arm B (p < 0.0001). The 1-year grade >= 2 xerostomia (RTOG criteria) was 63% vs 23% and 3-year 45% vs 11% in arms A and B, respectively. Xerostomia LENT-SOMA scale was also reduced in arm B. Dose-escalated IMRT did not reduce LRP with an adjusted HR of 1.13 [95%CI = 0.64-1.98] (p = 0.68). Survival was not different (adjusted HR: 1.19 [95%CI = 0.78-1. 81] |
DOI | 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.05.021 |