No Improvement of Hepatitis B Vaccination Response in Patients Dialysed with a Polymethylmethacrylate Membrane Compared to High-Flux Polysulfone: Results of the HEPADIAL Study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreNo Improvement of Hepatitis B Vaccination Response in Patients Dialysed with a Polymethylmethacrylate Membrane Compared to High-Flux Polysulfone: Results of the HEPADIAL Study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
Auteursde Precigout V, Germain C, Benard A, Lacraz A, Chauveau P, Deprele C, Seigneuric B, Pommereau A, Courivaud C, Douillet M, Taton B, Combe C, Contin-Bordes C
JournalBLOOD PURIFICATION
Volume49
Pagination265-271
Date PublishedMAY
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0253-5068
Mots-clésHepatitis B, Polymethylmethacrylate, Soluble CD40
Résumé

Background: An altered immune response and decreased vaccine response are observed in patients with chronic renal failure. A preliminary study of 15 non-immunised patients, despite appropriate previous hepatitis B vaccination, showed a 60% seroconversion rate after 3 months of dialysis with a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane. This response was associated with circulating soluble CD40 (CD40s) decrease, a natural inhibitor of the humoral immune response. The aim of the study is to confirm these results in a randomised study. Methods: We conducted a multicentre randomised intention-to-treat superiority clinical trial comparing polysulfone and a PMMA membrane in 2 parallel patient groups. The primary end point was the vaccine response rate, as defined by an anti-HBs antibodies titre of >10 IU/L, 1 month after the last vaccination with a double dose of Engerix B20 (R), performed at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 36. Results: Twenty-five patients were randomised and included in an intention-to-treat analysis. They were dialysed on polysulfone (n = 11) or PMMA (n = 14) for 40 weeks. Fifty percent of the PMMA patients versus 54.5% of the polysulfone patients achieved seroconversion (p = 1.00). The median anti-HBs antibody titre in responders at week 40 was 496 (92-750) versus 395 (43-572) UI/mL for PMMA and polysulfone, respectively (p = 0.46). The median CD40s titre at week 12 was 306 (193-448) versus 491 (281-515) pg/mL (p = 0.21). The CD40s median variation between week 0 and week 12 was 5 (-105 to 90) versus 64 (-63 to 123) pg/mL (p = 0.55). The CD40s level at week 12 in non-responders was slightly inferior to that of the responders: median 193 (168-331) versus 413 (281-512) pg/mL (p = 0.08). Conclusion: We did not observe a better vaccine response with the PMMA membrane compared to high-flux polysulfone. The PMMA membrane did not decrease the CD40s more than the polysulfone membrane probably because the titre was previously low in the 2 groups.

DOI10.1159/000504035