Management of liver failure in general intensive care unit

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreManagement of liver failure in general intensive care unit
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursPaugam-Burtz C., Levesque E., Louvet A., Thabut D., Amathieu R., Bureau C., Camus C., Chanques G., Faure S., Ferrandiere M., Francoz C., Galbois A., Gustot T., Ichai C., Ichai P., Jaber S., Lescot T., Moreau R., Roullet S., Saliba F., Thevenot T., Velly L., Weiss E.
JournalANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE
Volume39
Pagination143-161
Date PublishedFEB
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN2352-5568
Mots-clésAcute liver failure, Acute-on-chronic liver failure, cirrhosis, guidelines, Intensive care unit
Résumé

Objective: To produce French guidelines on Management of Liver failure in general Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Design: A consensus committee of 23 experts from the French Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (Societe francaise d'anesthesie et de reanimation, SFAR) and the French Association for the Study of the Liver (Association francaise pour l'etude du foie, AFEF) was convened. A formal conflict-ofinterest (COI) policy was developed at the start of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industrial funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide their assessment of the quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Some recommendations were ungraded. Methods: Two fields were defined: acute liver failure (ALF) and cirrhotic patients in general ICU. The panel focused on three questions with respect to ALF: (1) Which etiological examinations should be performed to reduce morbidity and mortality? (2) Which specific treatments should be initiated rapidly to reduce morbidity and mortality? (3) Which symptomatic treatment should be initiated rapidly to reduce morbidity and mortality? Seven questions concerning cirrhotic patients were addressed: (1) Which criteria should be used to guide ICU admission of cirrhotic patients in order to improve their prognosis? (2) Which specific management of kidney injury should be implemented to reduce morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic ICU patients? (3) Which specific measures to manage sepsis in order to reduce morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic ICU patients? (4) In which circumstances, human serum albumin should be administered to reduce morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic ICU patients? (5) How should digestive haemorrhage be treated in order to reduce morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic ICU patients? (6) How should haemostasis be managed in order to reduce morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic ICU patients? And (7) When should advice be obtained from an expert centre in order to reduce morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic ICU patients? Population, intervention, comparison and outcome (PICO) issues were reviewed and updated as required, and evidence profiles were generated. An analysis of the literature and recommendations was then performed in accordance with the GRADE (R) methodology. Results: The SFAR/AFEF Guidelines panel produced 18 statements on liver failure in general ICU. After two rounds of debate and various amendments, a strong agreement was reached on 100% of the recommendations: six had a high level of evidence (Grade 1 +/-), seven had a low level of evidence (Grade 2 +/-) and six were expert judgments. Finally, no recommendation was provided with respect to one question. Conclusions: Substantial agreement exists among experts regarding numerous strong recommendations on the optimum care of patients with liver failure in general ICU. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Societe francaise d'anesthesie et de reanimation (Sfar).

DOI10.1016/j.accpm.2019.06.014