Perioperative FOLFOX 4 Versus FOLFOX 4 Plus Cetuximab Versus Immediate Surgery for High-Risk Stage II and III Colon Cancers A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (PRODIGE 22)

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitrePerioperative FOLFOX 4 Versus FOLFOX 4 Plus Cetuximab Versus Immediate Surgery for High-Risk Stage II and III Colon Cancers A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (PRODIGE 22)
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursKaroui M., Rullier A., Piessen G., Legoux J.L, Barbier E., De Chaisemartin C., Lecaille C., Bouche O., Ammarguellat H., Brunetti F., Prudhomme M., Regimbeau J.M, Glehen O., Lievre A., Portier G., Hartwig J., Goujon G., Romain B., Lepage C., Taieb J., Investigators PRODIGE22
JournalANNALS OF SURGERY
Volume271
Pagination637-645
Date PublishedAPR
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0003-4932
Mots-cléscolectomy, colon cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Résumé

{Background: Perioperative chemotherapy has proven valuable in several tumors, but not in colon cancer (CC). Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic CC. Methods: This is a French multicenter randomized phase II trial in patients with resectable high-risk T3, T4, and/or N2 CC on baseline computed tomography (CT) scan. Patients were randomized to receive either 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX after colectomy (control) or perioperative FOLFOX for 4 cycles before surgery and 8 cycles after (FOLFOX peri-op). In RAS wild-type patients, a third arm testing perioperative FOLFOX-cetuximab was added. Tumor Regression Grade (TRG1) of Ryan et al was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were toxicity, perioperative morbidity, and quality of surgery. Results: A total of 120 patients were enrolled. At interim analysis, the FOLFOX-cetuximab arm was stopped (lack of efficacy). The remaining 104 patients (control

DOI10.1097/SLA.0000000000003454