Gastric Electrical Stimulation Reduces Refractory Vomiting in a Randomized Crossover Trial

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreGastric Electrical Stimulation Reduces Refractory Vomiting in a Randomized Crossover Trial
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2020
AuteursDucrotte P, Coffin B, Bonaz B, Fontaine S, Varannes SBruley Des, Zerbib F, Caiazzo R, Grimaud JCharles, Mion F, Hadjadj S, Valensi PElie, Vuitton L, Charpentier G, Ropert A, Altwegg R, Pouderoux P, Dorval E, Dapoigny M, Duboc H, Benhamou PYves, Schmidt A, Donnadieu N, Gourcerol G, Guerci B, Grp ENTERRARes
JournalGASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume158
Pagination506+
Date PublishedFEB
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0016-5085
Mots-clésnausea, therapy, treatment, vomiting
Résumé

BACKGROUND & AIMS: There have been conflicting results from trials of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for treatment of refractory vomiting, associated or not with gastroparesis. We performed a large, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial with crossover to study the efficacy of GES in patients with refractory vomiting, with or without gastroparesis. METHODS: For 4 months, we assessed symptoms in 172 patients (66% women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 45 +/- 12 years; 133 with gastroparesis) with chronic (>12 months) of refractory vomiting (idiopathic, associated with a type 1 or 2 diabetes, or postsurgical). A GES device was implanted and left unactivated until patients were randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner, to groups that received 4 months of stimulation parameters (14 Hz, 5 mA, pulses of 330 mu s) or no stimulation (control); 149 patients then crossed over to the other group for 4 months. Patients were examined at the end of each 4-month period (at 5 and 9 months after implantation). Primary endpoints were vomiting score, ranging from 0 (daily vomiting) to 4 (no vomiting), and the quality of life, assessed by the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scoring system. Secondary endpoints were changes in other digestive symptoms, nutritional status, gastric emptying, and control of diabetes. RESULTS: During both phases of the crossover study, vomiting scores were higher in the group with the device on (median score, 2) than the control group (median score, 1; P < .001), in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Vomiting scores increased significantly when the device was ON in patients with delayed (P < .01) or normal gastric emptying (P = .05). Gastric emptying was not accelerated during the ON period compared with the OFF period. Having the GES turned on was not associated with increased quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized crossover study, we found that GES reduced the frequency of refractory vomiting in patients with and without diabetes, although it did not accelerate gastric emptying or increase of quality of life.

DOI10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.018