Prognostic impact of EBV serostatus in patients with lymphomas or chronic malignancies undergoing allogeneic HCT

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitrePrognostic impact of EBV serostatus in patients with lymphomas or chronic malignancies undergoing allogeneic HCT
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursStyczynski J, Tridello G, Gil L, Ljungman P, Mikulska M, Ward KN, Cordonnier C, de la Camara R, Averbuch D, Knelange N, Socie G, Chevallier P, Blaise D, Yakoub-Agha I, Forcade E, Cornelissen J, Maertens J, Petersen E, Nguyen-Quoc S, Veelken H, Schaap N, Passweg J, Michallet M, Fegueux N, Deconinck E, Russell N, Basak G, Bader P, Montoto S, Kroeger N, Cesaro S, EBMT IDis Workin
JournalBONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume54
Pagination2060-2071
Date PublishedDEC
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0268-3369
Résumé

The influence of the donor (D) and recipient (R) pre-transplant Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) serostatus on transplant outcomes (overall survival, relapse-free survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, acute and chronic GVHD) in 12,931 patients with lymphomas or chronic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) between 1997- 2016 was analyzed. In multivariate analysis, the risk of development of chronic GVHD was increased for EBV R+/ D+ (HR = 1.26; p = 0.003), R+/D- (HR = 1.21; p = 0.044), and R-/D + (HR = 1.21; p = 0.048) in comparison to R-/D- transplants. No significance was shown for other transplant outcomes; however, in univariate analysis, EBV-seropositive patients receiving grafts from EBV-seropositive donors (EBV R+/D+ transplants) had inferior transplant outcomes in comparison to EBV-seronegative recipients of grafts from EBV-seronegative donors (EBV R-/D-): inferior overall survival ( 59.6% vs 65.9%), inferior relapse-free survival (51.1% vs 57.5%), increased incidence of chronic GVHD (49.5% vs 41.8%), and increased incidence of de novo chronic GVHD (30.5% vs 24.0%). In conclusion, an EBV-negative recipient with lymphoma or chronic malignancy can benefit from selection of an EBV-negative donor in context of chronic GVHD, while there are no preferences in donor EBV serostatus for EBV-seropositive recipient.

DOI10.1038/s41409-019-0627-9