Efficacy and Safety of Two Neoadjuvant Strategies With Bevacizumab in MRI-Defined Locally Advanced T3 Resectable Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized, Noncomparative Phase 2 INOVA Study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreEfficacy and Safety of Two Neoadjuvant Strategies With Bevacizumab in MRI-Defined Locally Advanced T3 Resectable Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized, Noncomparative Phase 2 INOVA Study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursBorg C, Mantion G, Boudghene F, Mornex F, Ghiringhelli F, Adenis A, Azria D, Balosso J, Ben Abdelghani M, Bachet JBaptiste, Vendrely V, Francois Y, Conroy T, Rio E, Roullet B, Spaeth D, Quero L, Lakkis Z, Coudert M, Ionescu-Goga M, Tanang A, Andre T
JournalCLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER
Volume18
Pagination200+
Date PublishedSEP
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1533-0028
Mots-clésBevacizumab, Fistula, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, Rectal cancer
Résumé

The INOVA randomized phase II study compared 2 neoadjuvant strategies for locally advanced rectal cancers. Final results up to 5 years of follow-up showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase late toxicities and may have the potential to increase survival outcomes. Background: Recurrence and distant metastases remain a significant issue in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Several multimodal strategies are assessed in clinical trials. Patients and Methods: Patients with mid/low magnetic resonance imagingedefined high-risk LARC were randomized to arm A (12-week bevacizumab thorn FOLFOX-4 then bevacizumabe5-fluorouracil [5-FU] eradiotherapy [RT] before total mesorectal excision [TME]) or arm B (bevacizumab-5-FUeRT then TME). Long-term efficacy and safety up to 5 years' follow-up are reported. No comparison between arms was planned. Results: Overall, 91 patients (46 in arm A and 45 in arm B) were included. Main results have been presented previously. During the late follow-up period (>4 weeks after surgery), 4 patients (8.7%) in arm A and 4 (8.9%) in arm B experienced grade 3/4 adverse events related to bevacizumab; the most frequent were 2 anastomotic fistulas (both in arm A) and abscesses (1 in arm A and 2 in arm B). At 5 years' follow-up, 9 (19.6%) and 11 (24.4%) patients in arms A and B developed a fistula in the year after surgery, and 2 (4.3%) in arm A at > 1 year after surgery. Most resolved before study end. Five-year disease-free survival was 70% and 64.3% in arms A and B, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 90.5% (95% confidence interval, 76.7, 96.3) in arm A and 72.7% (95% confidence interval, 56.0, 83.9) in arm B. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant bevacizumab thorn FOLFOX-4 may have the potential to increase survival outcomes when followed by bevacizumabe5-FUeRT and TME in LARC. Bevacizumabe5-FUeRT then TME was associated with a higher-than-projected rate of anastomotic fistulas. Further research of neoadjuvant strategies in LARC is encouraged.

DOI10.1016/j.clcc.2019.04.006