Argumentation for end of life decisions in type 3 maternity in France
| Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
| Titre | Argumentation for end of life decisions in type 3 maternity in France |
| Type de publication | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2019 |
| Auteurs | Alluin R, Martini P, Ricatte C, Spitz E, Vieux R |
| Journal | MEDECINE PALLIATIVE |
| Volume | 18 |
| Pagination | 224-225 |
| Date Published | SEP-OCT |
| Type of Article | Article |
| ISSN | 1636-6522 |
| Mots-clés | Argumentation, Handicap, Preterm, prognostic, Reanimation, Transgression |
| Résumé | The aim of this study was to understand on which arguments the end-of-life decisions in neonatal reanimation were taken. The study was a qualitative study by semi-guided individual interview with a thematic analysis. The components entering the discussions are numerous. There is sometimes confusion in intentionality. Decisions taken for end-of-life in neonatal reanimation often seem difficult especially in half-tone clinical pictures. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.medpal.2019.03.005 |