Long-term fatigue and quality of life among epithelial ovarian cancer survivors: a GINECO case/control VIVROVAIRE I study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreLong-term fatigue and quality of life among epithelial ovarian cancer survivors: a GINECO case/control VIVROVAIRE I study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursJoly F., Ahmed-Lecheheb D., Kalbacher E., Heutte N., Clarisse B., Grellard J.M, Gernier F., Berton-Rigaud D., Tredan O., Fabbro M., Savoye A.M, Kurtz J.E, Alexandre J., Follana P., Delecroix V., Dohollou N., Roemer-Becuwe C., De Rauglaudre G., Lortholary A., Prulhiere K., Lesoin A., Zannetti A., N'Guyen S., Trager-Maury S., Chauvenet L., S. Lacourtoisie A, Gompel A., Lhomme C., Floquet A., Pautier P.
JournalANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume30
Pagination845-852
Date PublishedMAY
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0923-7534
Mots-cléscancer treatment, chronic fatigue, Epithelial ovarian cancer, long-term survivorship, Quality of life
Résumé

{Background: Few data are available on long-term fatigue (LTF) and quality of life (QoL) among epithelial ovarian cancer survivors (EOCS). In this case-control study, we compared LTF, symptoms and several QoL domains in EOCS relapse-free >= 3 years after first-line treatment and age-matched healthy women. Patients and methods: EOCS were recruited from 25 cooperative GINECO centers in France. Controls were randomly selected from the electoral rolls. All participants completed validated self-reported questionnaires: fatigue (FACIT-F), QoL (FACT-G/O), neurotoxicity (FACT-Ntx), anxiety/depression (HADS), sleep disturbance (ISI), and physical activity (IPAQ). Severe LTF (SLTF) was defined as a FACIT-F score <37/52. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to analyze SLTF and its influencing factors in EOCS. Results: A total of 318 EOCS and 318 controls were included. EOCS were 63-year-old on average, with FIGO stage I/II (50%), III/IV (48%); 99% had received platinum and taxane chemotherapy, with an average 6-year follow-up. There were no differences between the two groups in socio-demographic characteristics and global QoL. EOCS had poorer FACIT-F scores (40 versus 45, P < 0.0001), lower functional well-being scores (18 versus 20

DOI10.1093/annonc/mdz074