Risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a French case-control-control study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreRisk factors for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a French case-control-control study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursNicolas-Chanoine M-H, Vigan M, Laouenan C, Robert J, Laurans C, Vachee A, Lemaitre N, Pantel A, Lavigne J-P, Cavalie L, Marty N, Bertrand X, de Champs C, Bajolet O, Limelette A, Corvec S, Bourigault C, Lepelletier D, van der Mee-Marquet N, Merens A, Carbonnelle E, Billard-Pomares T, Bert F, Leflon-Guibout V, Duprilot M, Nerome S, Cambau E, Jacquier H, Benmansour H, Robert J, Jarlier V, Lafeuille E, Decre D, Grp E-CStudy
JournalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume38
Pagination383-393
Date PublishedFEB
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0934-9723
Mots-clésCarbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), Case-control-control study, Multicentre study, Risk factors
Résumé

This study aimed to assess characteristics associated with infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), producing (CPE) or not producing (non-CPE) carbapenemase, among hospitalised patients in 2014-2016 in France. Case-patients with CRE were compared to two control populations. In multivariate analysis comparing 160 CRE cases to 160 controls C1 (patients with a clinical sample positive for carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae), five characteristics were linked to CRE: male gender (OR=1.9; 95% CI=1.3-3.4), travel in Asia (OR=10.0; 95% CI=1.1-91.2) and hospitalisation in (OR=2.4; 95% CI=1.3-4.4) or out of (OR=4.4; 95% CI=0.8-24.1) France in the preceding 12months, infection in the preceding 3months (OR=3.0; 95% CI=1.5-5.9), and antibiotic receipt between admission and inclusion (OR=1.9; 95% CI=1.0-3.3). In multivariate analysis comparing 148 CRE cases to 148 controls C2 [patients with culture-negative sample(s)], four characteristics were identified: prior infection (OR=3.3; 95% CI=1.6-6.8), urine drainage (OR=3.0; 95% CI=1.5-6.1) and mechanical ventilation (OR=3.7; 95% CI=1.1-13.0) during the current hospitalisation, and antibiotic receipt between admission and inclusion (OR=6.6; 95% CI=2.8-15.5). Univariate analyses comparing separately CPE cases to controls (39 CPE vs C1 and 36 CPE vs C2) and non-CPE cases to controls (121 non-CPE vs C1 and 112 non-CPE vs C2), concomitantly with comparison of CPE to non-CPE cases showed that only CPE cases were at risk of previous travel and hospitalisation abroad. This study shows that, among CRE, risk factors are different for CPE and non-CPE infection, and suggests that question patients about their medical history and lifestyle should help for early identification of patients at risk of CPE among patients with CRE.

DOI10.1007/s10096-018-3438-9