Clinical frailty scale and outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreClinical frailty scale and outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuteursReichart D, Rosato S, Nammas W, Onorati F, Dalen M, Castro L, Gherli R, Gatti G, Franzese I, Faggian G, De Feo M, Khodabandeh S, Santarpino G, Rubino AS, Maselli D, Nardella S, Salsano A, Nicolini F, Zanobini M, Saccocci M, Bounader K, Kinnunen E-M, Tauriainen T, Airaksinen J, Seccareccia F, Mariscalco G, Ruggieri VG, Perrotti A, Biancari F
JournalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume54
Pagination1102-1109
Date PublishedDEC
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1010-7940
Mots-clésCardiac surgery, clinical frailty scale, Coronary artery bypass grafting, frailty
Résumé

{OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of frailty on the outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and whether it may improve the predictive ability of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II). METHODS: The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was assessed preoperatively in patients undergoing isolated CABG from the multicentre E-CABG registry, and patients were stratified into 3 classes: scores 1-2, scores 3-4 and scores 5-7. RESULTS: Of the 6156 patients enrolled, 39.2% had CFS scores 1-2, 57.6% scores 3-4, and 3.2% scores 5-7. Logistic regression adjusted for multiple covariates showed that the CFS was an independent predictor of hospital/30-day mortality [CFS scores 3-4, odds ratio (OR) 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-7.14; CFS scores 5-7, OR 5.90, 95% CI 2.67-13.05] and resulted in an Integrated Improvement Index of 1.3 (P < 0.001) and a Net Reclassification Index of 55.6 (P < 0.001) for prediction of hospital/30-day mortality. Adding the CFS classes to EuroSCORE II resulted in an Integrated Improvement Index of 0.9 (P < 0.001) and Net Reclassification Index of 59.6 (P < 0.001) for prediction of hospital/30-day mortality with a significantly larger area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.809 vs 0.781

DOI10.1093/ejcts/ezy222