Continuation of Bevacizumab vs Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy After First Progression in KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer The UNICANCER PRODIGE18 Randomized Clinical Trial
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Continuation of Bevacizumab vs Cetuximab Plus Chemotherapy After First Progression in KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer The UNICANCER PRODIGE18 Randomized Clinical Trial |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2019 |
Auteurs | Bennouna J, Hiret S, Bertaut A, Bouche O, Deplanque G, Borel C, Francois E, Conroy T, Ghiringhelli F, Guetz GDes, Seitz J-F, Artru P, Hebbar M, Stanbury T, Denis MG, Adenis A, Borg C |
Journal | JAMA ONCOLOGY |
Volume | 5 |
Pagination | 83-90 |
Date Published | JAN |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 2374-2437 |
Résumé | IMPORTANCE Second-line treatment with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab or cetuximab is a valid option for metastatic colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 4 months with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab vs cetuximab for patients with progression of metastatic colorectal cancer after bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted from December 14, 2010, to May 5, 2015. The main eligibility criterion was disease progression after bevacizumab plus fluorouracil with irinotecan or oxaliplatin in patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. All analyses were performed on the modified intent-to-treat population. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to arm A (FOLFIRI [fluorouracil and folinic acid combined with irinotecan] or modified FOLFOX6 [fluorouracil and folinic acid combined with oxaliplatin] plus bevacizumab) or arm B (FOLFIRI or modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab); the second-line chemotherapy regimen was chosen according to first-line treatment (crossover). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end pointwas the 4-month PFS rate. Secondary end points included safety, objective response rate, overall survival, and PFS. RESULTS A total of 132 patients (47 women and 85 men; median age, 63.0 years [range, 33.0-84.0 years]; 74 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 54 patients with a performance status of 1, and 4 patients with unknown performance status) were included at 25 sites. The 4-month PFS rate was 80.3% (95% CI, 68.0%-88.3%) in arm A and 66.7% (95% CI, 53.6%-76.8%) in arm B. The median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.7-8.2 months) in arm A and 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.2-6.5 months) in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-1.02; P = .06), and the median overall survival was 15.8 months (95% CI, 9.5-22.3 months) in arm A and 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.0-16.2 months) in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.46-1.04; P = .08). A central analysis of KRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4), NRAS (exons 2, 3, and 4), and BRAF (V600) was performed for 95 tumor samples. Eighty-one patients had wild-type KRAS and wild-type NRAS tumors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The results of the PRODIGE18 (Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie DIGEstive) study showed a nonsignificant difference but favored continuation of bevacizumab with chemotherapy crossover for patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer that progressed with first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. |
DOI | 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4465 |