Expectation about maintenance therapy among the GINECO French ovarian cancer cohort from the European NOGGO/ENGOT-ov22 Expression IV survey
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Expectation about maintenance therapy among the GINECO French ovarian cancer cohort from the European NOGGO/ENGOT-ov22 Expression IV survey |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2018 |
Auteurs | Lorcet M, Lortholary A, Kurtz JEmmanuel, Berton-Rigaud D, Fabbro M, Rouge TDe la Mott, Kaminsky-Forrett MChristine, Floquet A, Freyer G, Combe P, Dohollou N, Kalbacher E, Despax R, Largillier R, Bessard AClaire Har, Gane N, Sehouli J, Oskay-Oezcelik G, Licaj I, Ray-Coquard I, Lobbedez FJoly |
Journal | BULLETIN DU CANCER |
Volume | 105 |
Pagination | 465-474 |
Date Published | MAY |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0007-4551 |
Mots-clés | Maintenance, Ovarian cancer, Survey |
Résumé | Background > Expression IV survey evaluated the patients' expectations to a maintenance therapy. Methods > From January 2015 to March 2016, 401 French patients, in first line or recurrent disease, answered a 24-items anonymous questionnaire. The results were specifically analyzed according to the demographic characteristics and treatment lines. Results > Among the patients, 62% had already been informed about maintenance therapy. Thirty-seven percent of patients received a maintenance treatment: 111 patients during first line and 39 patients in relapse. Expectations of patients were: 1) the chance of cure (73%), 2) the tumor shrinkage (36%), 3) quality of life improvement (35%) and 4) tumor growth reduction (27%). Among the responders, 42% were willing to take the treatment for 6-24 months, 20% for 24-60 months and 38% until tumor progression. 64% of patients expected more than a 6 months progression-free survival. Patients older than 70 years were less informed than their younger counterparts (48% vs 66%) and had lesser hope for cure with maintenance treatment (60% vs 77%). Patients in relapse had more expectation than patients in remission (tumor shrinkage: 47% vs 22%, slowing of tumor growth: 37% vs 15%, improving the progression-free survival of more than 6 months: 71% vs 53%, respectively). Among patients, 48% in relapse consented to take a treatment until progression vs 24% of patients in remission. Conclusion > This sub-analysis in French patients demonstrate a gap between the efficacy of maintenance therapy and the patients' expectations in ovarian cancer, particularly in relapsing disease justifying better information and explanations. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.bulcan.2018.01.015 |