Does intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent nerves have an impact on the postoperative palsy rate? Results of a prospective multicenter study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreDoes intraoperative neuromonitoring of recurrent nerves have an impact on the postoperative palsy rate? Results of a prospective multicenter study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuteursMirallie E, Caillard C, Pattou F, Brunaud L, Hamy A, Dahan M, Prades M, Mathonnet M, Landecy G, Dernis H-P, Lifante J-C, Sebag F, Jegoux F, Babin E, Bizon A, Espitalier F, Durand-Zaleski I, Volteau C, Blanchard C
JournalSURGERY
Volume163
Pagination124-129
Date PublishedJAN
Type of ArticleArticle; Proceedings Paper
ISSN0039-6060
Résumé

{Background. The impact of intraoperative neuromonitoring on recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy remains debated. Our aim was to evaluate the potential protective effect of intraoperative neuromonitoring on recurrent laryngeal nerve during total thyroidectomy. Methods. This was a prospective, multicenter French national study. The use of intraoperative neuromonitoring was left at the surgeons' choice. Postoperative laryngoscopy was performed systematically at day 1 to 2 after operation and at 6 months in case of postoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Univariate and multivariate analyses and propensity score (sensitivity analysis) were performed to compare recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates between patients operated with or without intraoperative neuromonitoring. Results. Among 1,328 patients included (females 79.9%, median age 51.2 years, median body mass index 25.6 kg/m(2)), 807 (60.8%) underwent intraoperative neuromonitoring. Postoperative abnormal vocal cord mobility was diagnosed in 131 patients (9.92%), including 69 (8.6%) and 62 (12.1%) in the intraoperative neuromonitoring and nonintraoperative neuromonitoring groups, respectively. Intraoperative neuromonitoring was associated with a lesser rate of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in univariate analysis (odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.47; 0.98

DOI10.1016/j.surg.2017.03.029