Patients' perceived tolerance of side effects in phase I cancer clinical trials: A qualitative study
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Patients' perceived tolerance of side effects in phase I cancer clinical trials: A qualitative study |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2017 |
Auteurs | Bredart A., Bodson S., Le Tourneau C., Flahault C., Bonnetain F., Beaudeau A., Coquan E., Dolbeault S., Paoletti X. |
Journal | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE |
Volume | 26 |
Pagination | e12596 |
Date Published | NOV |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0961-5423 |
Mots-clés | health-related quality of life, molecular targeted agents, patients' subjective experiences, Phase I clinical trial, Qualitative study, treatment tolerance |
Résumé | This qualitative study aimed to explore cancer patients' perceived tolerance of side effects in phase I drug trials. Patients with solid tumours receiving molecularly targeted agents with/without chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. In-depth semi-structured interviews were carried out with 17 patients with a median [range] age of 63 [41-72] years. Treatment was discontinued in seven patients. Verbatim transcripts of the audio-taped interviews were analysed using a constructivist grounded theory approach. Four conceptual categories emerged from data analysis, labelled suffering from side effects comprising a range of symptoms, psychosocial or role disturbances; striving to cope with side effects reflecting psychological strategies for managing side effects; hoping reflecting expectations about treatment efficacy and relief from side effects; and appraisal of care. Among patients remaining in the trial, treatment was currently perceived as fairly tolerable. For most respondents, whether still in a trial or not, treatment discontinuation could not be justified by the non-tolerance of treatment side effects. These results question the adequacy of patient-perceived tolerance reports to determine an optimal drug dose for phase II trials. Confronted with patients' hopes and inappropriate beliefs, communication is challenging in phase I trials and could benefit from facilitating psychosocial interventions. |
DOI | 10.1111/ecc.12596 |