Evaluation of Doppler-ultrasonography in the diagnosis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction: A prospective study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreEvaluation of Doppler-ultrasonography in the diagnosis of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt dysfunction: A prospective study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuteursNicolas C, Le Gouge A, d'Alteroche L, Ayoub J, Georgescu M, Vidal V, Castaing D, Cercueil J-P, Chevallier P, Roumy J, Trillaud H, Boyer L, Le Pennec V, Perret C, Giraudeau B, Perarnau J-M, Grp STIC-TIPS
JournalWORLD JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume9
Pagination1125-1132
Date PublishedSEP 28
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1948-5182
Mots-clésDoppler-ultrasonography, Dysfunction, Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
Résumé

AIM To prospectively evaluate the performance of Doppler-ultrasonography (US) for the detection of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) dysfunction within a multicenter cohort of cirrhotic patients. METHODS This study was conducted in 10 french teaching hospitals. After TIPS insertion, angiography and liver Doppler-US were carried out every six months to detect dysfunction (defined by a portosystemic gradient >= 12 mmHg and/or a stent stenosis >= 50%). The association between ultrasonographic signs and dysfunction was studied by logistic random-effects models, and the diagnostic performance of each Doppler criterion was estimated by the bootstrap method. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Tours. RESULTS Two hundred and eighteen pairs of examinations performed on 87 cirrhotic patients were analyzed. Variables significantly associated with dysfunction were: The speed of flow in the portal vein (P = 0.008), the reversal of flow in the right (P = 0.038) and left (P = 0.049) portal branch, the loss of modulation of portal flow by the right atrium (P = 0.0005), ascites (P = 0.001) and the overall impression of the operator (P = 0.0001). The diagnostic performances of these variables were low; sensitivity was < 58% and negative predictive value was < 73%. Therefore, dysfunction cannot be ruled out from Doppler-US. CONCLUSION The performance of Doppler-US for the detection of TIPS dysfunction is poor compared to angiography. New tools are needed to improve diagnosis of TIPS dysfunction.

DOI10.4254/wjh.v9.i27.1125