Algorithms for the identification of hospital stays due to osteoporotic femoral neck fractures in European medical administrative databases using ICD-10 codes: A non-systematic review of the literature

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreAlgorithms for the identification of hospital stays due to osteoporotic femoral neck fractures in European medical administrative databases using ICD-10 codes: A non-systematic review of the literature
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuteursCaillet P., Oberlin P., Monnet E., Guillon-Grammatico L., Metral P., Belhassen M., Denier P., Banaei-Bouchareb L., Viprey M., Biau D., Schott A.-M
JournalREVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE
Volume65
PaginationS198-S208
Date PublishedOCT
Type of ArticleReview
ISSN0398-7620
Mots-clésDatabase, Health Information Systems, Hip fractures, Osteoporotic fractures, Patient Selection
Résumé

Background. - Osteoporotic hip fractures (OHF) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The French medico-administrative database (SNIIRAM) offers an interesting opportunity to improve the management of OHF. However, the validity of studies conducted with this database relies heavily on the quality of the algorithm used to detect OHF. The aim of the REDSIAM network is to facilitate the use of the SNIIRAM database. The main objective of this study was to present and discuss several OHF-detection algorithms that could be used with this database. Methods. - A non-systematic literature search was performed. The Medline database was explored during the period January 2005-August 2016. Furthermore, a snowball search was then carried out from the articles included and field experts were contacted. The extraction was conducted using the chart developed by the REDSIAM network's ``Methodology'' task force. Results. - The ICD-10 codes used to detect OHF are mainly S72.0, S72.1, and S72.2. The performance of these algorithms is at best partially validated. Complementary use of medical and surgical procedure codes would affect their performance. Finally, few studies described how they dealt with fractures of non-osteoporotic origin, re-hospitalization, and potential contralateral fracture cases. Conclusions. - Authors in the literature encourage the use of ICD-10 codes S72.0 to S72.2 to develop algorithms for OHF detection. These are the codes most frequently used for OHF in France. Depending on the study objectives, other ICD10 codes and medical and surgical procedures could be usefully discussed for inclusion in the algorithm. Detection and management of duplicates and non-osteoporotic fractures should be considered in the process. Finally, when a study is based on such an algorithm, all these points should be precisely described in the publication. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.respe.2017.04.058