Rib cartilage grafting in upper limb surgery: an overview

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreRib cartilage grafting in upper limb surgery: an overview
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuteursObert L, Loisel F, Gindraux F, Tropet Y, Lepage D
JournalSICOT-J
Volume1
Pagination13
Type of ArticleReview
ISSN2426-8887
Mots-clésChondrocostal graft, Osteoarthritis, Rib cartilage, Upper limb surgery
Résumé

Introduction: Used routinely in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery, the chondrocostal graft is also used in hand surgery. The purpose of this overview was to analyze at long follow-up the radiological and histological evolution of this autograft, in the hand and wrist surgery. Materials and methods: Since 1992, 144 patients have benefitted from a chondrocostal autograft: 116 osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint, 18 radioscaphoid arthritis, six articular malunions of the distal radius, four kienbock, and four traumatic loss of cartilage of the PIP joint. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed in 19 patients and histological study in 12 patients with a mean follow-up of 68 months (4-159). Results: Whatever the indication, the reconstruction by a chondrocostal or ostochondrocostal graft has allowed us to obtain satisfactory clinical results at long follow-up. The main question was the viability of the graft. The radiological study has shown the non-wear of the graft and a certain degree of ossification. The MRI confirmed a very small degree of osseous metaplasia but its viability. The biopsies showed a neo-vascularization of the cartilage. Conclusion: Despite the strong mechanical strain in the hand and wrist, the chondrocostal graft is a biological arthroplasty, trustworthy and secure at long time even if it can cause infrequent complications inherent to this type of surgery. Despite the inevitable histological modification, the cartilage remains alive and is of satisfactory quality at long term follow-up and fulfilling the requirements for interposition and reconstruction of an articular surface.

DOI10.1051/sicotj/2015003