Quality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreQuality indicators for acute myocardial infarction: A position paper of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuteursSchiele F, Gale CP, Bonnefoy E, Capuano F, Claeys MJ, Danchin N, Fox KAA, Huber K, Iakobishvili Z, Lettino M, Quinn T, Gimenez MRubini, Botker HE, Swahn E, Timmis A, Tubaro M, Vrints C, Walker D, Zahger D, Zeymer U, Bueno H
JournalEUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE
Volume6
Pagination34-59
Date PublishedFEB
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN2048-8726
Mots-clésacute cardiovascular care, anti-thrombotic treatment, centre organisation, composite indicator, discharge treatment, Myocardial infarction, Patient satisfaction, quality indicators, quality of care, Reperfusion, Risk assessment
Résumé

Evaluation of quality of care is an integral part of modern healthcare, and has become an indispensable tool for health authorities, the public, the press and patients. However, measuring quality of care is difficult, because it is a multifactorial and multidimensional concept that cannot be estimated solely on the basis of patients' clinical outcomes. Thus, measuring the process of care through quality indicators (QIs) has become a widely used practice in this context. Other professional societies have published QIs for the evaluation of quality of care in the context of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but no such indicators exist in Europe. In this context, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Acute Cardiovascular Care Association (ACCA) has reflected on the measurement of quality of care in the context of AMI (ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)) and created a set of QIs, with a view to developing programmes to improve quality of care for the management of AMI across Europe. We present here the list of QIs defined by the ACCA, with explanations of the methodology used, scientific justification and reasons for the choice for each measure.

DOI10.1177/2048872616643053