Implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers in routine practice

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreImplementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers in routine practice
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuteursBednarek C., Nguyen T.VF, Puyraveau M., Bonnet E., Lescut N., Azelie C., Miny J., Mauvais O., Maurina T., Tochet F., Bosset J.-F, Thariat J., Sun X.S
JournalCANCER RADIOTHERAPIE
Volume21
Pagination21-27
Date PublishedFEB
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN1278-3218
Mots-clésHead and Neck cancer, IMRT, Locoregional failures, Treatment planning
Résumé

Purpose. - To report on patterns of relapse following implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and subsequent changes in practice in a tertiary care centre. Patients and methods. - Between 2008 and 2011, 188 consecutive patients (mean age 59 years old) received intensity-modulated radiotherapies with curative intent for squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity (17.5%), oropharynx (43%), hypopharynx (21%), larynx (14%), sinonasal cavities (6%), nasopharynx (1.5%) at the university hospital of Besancon. There were stage I and II 9%, III 24.5%, IV 66.5%. One hundred and thirty-eight underwent exclusive intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 50 underwent postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy, 174 had concurrent chemotherapy, 57 had induction chemotherapy. Dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy with static fields was performed for all patients using sequential irradiation in 174 patients and simultaneous integrated boost irradiation in 14 patients. Results. - With a median follow-up was 27.5 months, there was 79% of locoregional failures occurred in the 95% isodose. Two-year overall survival, disease-free, local failure-free and locoregional failure-free survival rates were 73%, 60%, 79% and 72%, respectively. Prognostic factors for disease-free survival were stage (IV vs. I-III) with a relative risk of 1.7 [1.1-2.8] (P = 0.02) and T stage with 1.6 [1.04-2.5] (P = 0.03). Conclusion. - The current series showed similar patterns of failure as in other tertiary care centres. We did not identify intensity-modulated radiotherapy specific relapse risks. (C) 2016 Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.canrad.2016.07.103