Evaluation of satisfaction after in-office conization under local anesthesia
Affiliation auteurs | !!!! Error affiliation !!!! |
Titre | Evaluation of satisfaction after in-office conization under local anesthesia |
Type de publication | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2016 |
Auteurs | Cattin J., Rufenacht E., Roesch M., Chehab M., Ramanah R., Riethmuller D. |
Journal | JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION |
Volume | 45 |
Pagination | 948-954 |
Date Published | OCT |
Type of Article | Article |
ISSN | 0368-2315 |
Mots-clés | Cervix intraepithelial neoplasia, Conization, In-office, Satisfaction |
Résumé | Objectives. - Treating cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is essential in cervix carcinoma prevention and conization is the standard treatment. In the current medical and economic context, which advocates the simplification of procedures, loop excision conization is well adapted to an in-office procedure. Therefore, we evaluated the patient satisfaction after an in-office conization. Method. - We conducted an observational study at the Besancon University Medical Centre. Between November 2013 and October 2014, all patients treated by an in-office conization were included. Global satisfaction of patient was retrospectively collected by answering a telephone questionnaire. Results. - Seventy patients were treated by in-office conization and answered the questionnaire. Global satisfaction was 88.6%. Moreover, 75.7% of patients declared to have felt no pain or moderate pain during the conization. Most of the patients (91.4%) would advise this in-office care to their relatives. The rate of positive margins for dysplasia was 31.4% and postoperative haemorrhage occurred in 7.1%. Conclusion. - In this context of medical care cost reduction, conization seems to be perfectly adapted to in-office surgery. It was also found to be well accepted by patients without raising neither positive margins rate nor postoperative haemorrhage risk. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.03.006 |