Do outdoor environmental noise and atmospheric NO2 levels spatially overlap in urban areas?

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreDo outdoor environmental noise and atmospheric NO2 levels spatially overlap in urban areas?
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuteursTenailleau QM, Bernard N, Pujol S, Parmentier A-L, Boilleaut M, Houot H, Joly D, Mauny F
JournalENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume214
Pagination767-775
Date PublishedJUL
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0269-7491
Mots-clésAir pollution, Co-exposure, environmental exposure assessment, GIS, models, Multiple-exposure, urban noise
Résumé

The urban environment holds numerous emission sources for air and noise pollution, creating optimum conditions for environmental multi-exposure situations. Evaluation of the joint-exposure levels is the main obstacle for multi-exposure studies and one of the biggest challenges of the next decade. The present study aims to describe the noise/NO2 multi-exposure situations in the urban environment by exploring the possible discordant and concordant situations of both exposures. Fine-scale diffusion models were developed in the European medium-sized city of Besancon (France), and a classification method was used to evaluate the multi-exposure situations in the facade perimeter of 10,825 buildings. Although correlated (Pearson's r = 0.64, p < 0.01), urban spatial distributions of the noise and NO2 around buildings do not overlap, and 30% of the buildings were considered to be discordant in terms of the noise and NO2 exposure levels. This discrepancy is spatially structured and associated with variables describing the building's environment. Our results support the presence of several co-existing, multi exposure situations across the city impacted by both the urban morphology and the emission and diffusion/propagation phases of each pollutant. Identifying the mechanisms of discrepancy and convergence of multi-exposure situations could help improve the health risk assessment and public health. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.082