Anal incontinence and vesico-sphincter events in systemic sclerosis: An epidemiologic bicentric cohort study

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreAnal incontinence and vesico-sphincter events in systemic sclerosis: An epidemiologic bicentric cohort study
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuteursMartin M, Meaux-Ruault N, Magy-Bertrand N, Beraud G, Parratte B, Roblot P
JournalSEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume46
Pagination124-132
Date PublishedAUG
Type of ArticleReview
ISSN0049-0172
Mots-clésFecal incontinence, Quality of life, SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS, Urinary bladder
Résumé

Objective: To estimate the frequency and severity of anal incontinence and vesico-sphincter events, associated factors, and impact on the quality of life of patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: Questionnaires assessing anal incontinence (Miller score), vesico-sphincter events (Urogenital Distress Inventory) and quality of life [Short Form Health Survey 36v2 (SF-36), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale] were mailed to 139 patients with systemic sclerosis at the university hospitals of Besancon and Poitiers, France. Clinical data were collected from the medical records to identify risk factors. Results: Among the 121 (87%) responders, severe vesico-sphincter events or severe anal incontinence occurred in 3.4% and 12.4% of cases, respectively. Frequent urination (66.3%) and anal incontinence to gas (50.4%) were the most frequent symptoms. Anal incontinence was associated positively with vesico-sphincter events, unrelated to obstetrical factors. No correlations were seen with age, sex, or systemic sclerosis characteristics. In multivariate analysis, moderate or severe vesico-sphincter events was associated with higher anxiety and depression scores and lower SF-36 scores; the same results were observed for anal incontinence, but did not reach significance. Conclusion: Vesico-sphincter events and anal incontinence are common in systemic sclerosis, and sometimes severe, with a potential negative impact in quality of life. These results will be confirmed by a case control study with dynamic and manometric assessment, and could legitimate a systematic screening to ensure early therapy and multidisciplinary individual management. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.03.013