Survey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: the crucial role of symbolic embryo representation

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreSurvey of 243 ART patients having made a final disposition decision about their surplus cryopreserved embryos: the crucial role of symbolic embryo representation
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuteursBruno C., Dudkiewicz-Sibony C., Berthaut I., Weil E., Brunet L., Fortier C., Pfeffer J., Ravel C., Fauque P., Mathieu E., Antoine J.M, Kotti S., Mandelbaum J.
JournalHUMAN REPRODUCTION
Volume31
Pagination1508-1514
Date PublishedJUL
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0268-1161
Mots-clésembryo disposition decision, embryo donation, fate of cryopreserved embryos, frozen embryo, gamete donation, human embryo symbolic representation, IVF
Résumé

{STUDY QUESTION: In couples who have chosen and confirmed the fate of surplus frozen embryos, which factors influence their decision, with a special emphasis on their symbolic representation of the embryo(s)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Embryo representation and gamete donation use significantly influence the fate of surplus cryopreserved embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous studies report difficulties for couples to decide whether or not to continue storing their frozen embryo(s) and different factors have been already highlighted which influence their decision, including embryo conceptualization, information and support provided by the medical institution, quality of embryo(s) and life events. Little is known, however, about couples who definitely decided to stop their parental project and finalized the process of decision-making about the fate of their cryopreserved embryo(s). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This prospective study was conducted over a period of 3 years (2007-2010) and included IVF/ICSI patients with surplus frozen embryos, who made a final embryo disposition decision. Among the 280 eligible IVF/ICSI patients, 247 agreed to participate in the study. According to the available options, 91 persons chose to `stop cryopreservation', 77 chose donation to `research' and 48 `embryo donation' to infertile couples. Furthermore, 31 participants who chose embryo donation for a parental project were refused by the center as not compatible with their mandatory medical conditions. Among them, 27 participants then selected donation to research as a new option and were included in a fourth group: `donation to research after Refusal of Embryo Donation for parental project' or `research-RED' (n = 27). Four participants chose `stop cryopreservation', however, given the small number of subjects this latter group was not included in the analysis. In all, 243 participants who made a final choice concerning the fate of their cryopreserved embryos were included in this study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants were sent a letter of invitation to a semi-structured interview of 30 min with a psychologist. Interviews were conducted separately for each partner, including a questionnaire with a common part and a specific part, according to the chosen option, and allowing a quantitative evaluation. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the link between their embryo representation and their decision about their embryos' fate. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After adjustment for age, gender, gamete donation, number of children and the different embryo representations, a choice to `stop cryopreservation' is more frequent if the embryo is represented as a child [odds ratio (OR) adjusted = 3.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.62-6.66]

DOI10.1093/humrep/dew104