Second twin delivery in cephalic presentation. Apropos of a series of 127 patients

Affiliation auteurs!!!! Error affiliation !!!!
TitreSecond twin delivery in cephalic presentation. Apropos of a series of 127 patients
Type de publicationJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuteursRoesch M., Bourtembourg A., Panouilleres M., Ramanah R., Riethmuller D.
JournalJOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION
Volume45
Pagination291-299
Date PublishedMAR
Type of ArticleArticle
ISSN0368-2315
Mots-clésCephalic presentation, Second twin, Twin pregnancy, Vaginal delivery
Résumé

Introduction. - In 2009, the French National College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (CNGOF) clinical practice guidelines encouraged the active management of the second twin (T2) in high and mobile cephalic presentation (CP) by performing systematic internal maneuvers. In our department, this type of management is less frequent as whenever T2 is not delivered spontaneously after a short time interval, an instrumental extraction is realized. Materials and methods. - We analyzed our practice for 5 years upon 127 twin pregnancies with a trial of vaginal delivery for T2 in CP. We compared the results following different modes of delivery which are: spontaneous delivery, instrumental extraction, and total breech extraction after manual internal version. Results. - No significant difference was found among the 3 groups in terms of maternal, fetal and neonatal well-being. Moreover, instrumental delivery was feasible, with a mean time interval for delivery between the 2 twins < 15 minutes, even when performed by an obstetrician on training. Conclusion. - The aim of our study was to evaluate our practice on T2 in CP, because this event can be quite tricky, thus discouraging less experienced obstetricians towards this practice and resulting in an increase in caesarean sections for T2. Instrumental delivery should be considered a possible option for any T2 in CP so as to ensure the continued existence of vaginal births for twin pregnancies. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

DOI10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.04.002